 
    
    
         
Economists have raised strong objections
about the dire outcomes predicted by envionmentalists
using systems dynamics models, 
such as that of the Club of Rome [Meadows  , 1972].
One of their criticisms concerns the ability
 of market mechanisms to damp dangerous oscillations [Stiglitz, 1979,Cropper
, 1972].
One of their criticisms concerns the ability
 of market mechanisms to damp dangerous oscillations [Stiglitz, 1979,Cropper  , 1979]. The argument is
 that when a resource becomes rare 
its concomitant price increase
lowers its exploitation, or favors technologies
less wasteful in resource usage.
, 1979]. The argument is
 that when a resource becomes rare 
its concomitant price increase
lowers its exploitation, or favors technologies
less wasteful in resource usage.
Let us rewrite the production in monetary units as
where
 
in order to introduce a production in value which depends upon the production
 in fishes, instead of the previous expression which 
contained only a constant production coefficient,  .
.
The differential equation for the resource, N, remains unchanged. (We use equation 3 from section 2 without the carrying capacity term). The only change occurs in the differential equation for the capital:
A simple monetary coefficient function  is given by:
 is given by:
and the differential equation for the capital is then:
   
Figure 8: Plot of the production expressed in monetary units,  ,
as a function of production, P, for the 
 functions used in section 4. The solid line corresponds
to "market" prices with coefficients b=2 and
,
as a function of production, P, for the 
 functions used in section 4. The solid line corresponds
to "market" prices with coefficients b=2 and  of the first model, equation  33.
 Note the plateau region which gives
a constant income at large production. The dotted line
corresponds to the second model with a minimum sustained price
of the first model, equation  33.
 Note the plateau region which gives
a constant income at large production. The dotted line
corresponds to the second model with a minimum sustained price 
 , with the same values for b and c, equation
  39.
, with the same values for b and c, equation
  39.
Figure 8 indicates a simple interpretation of the 
coefficients
b and c in the fraction  : b is a maximum production in value, obtained when the catch
goes to infinity, and c is a characteristic scale on the production P.
: b is a maximum production in value, obtained when the catch
goes to infinity, and c is a characteristic scale on the production P.
 is the maximum price, which is obtained at zero production.
We might consider that the above function reflects 
the situation where there is a
strong decrease of prices with production since value production
 saturates at high production: there remains no incentive
for producers to increase the catch in this regime.
Under "normal"
 circumstances, the decrease of
 is the maximum price, which is obtained at zero production.
We might consider that the above function reflects 
the situation where there is a
strong decrease of prices with production since value production
 saturates at high production: there remains no incentive
for producers to increase the catch in this regime.
Under "normal"
 circumstances, the decrease of  with P is probably
less strong than in expression 33. Price dynamics under
normal economic conditions
are probably intermediate between the models of section 2 and 4.
 with P is probably
less strong than in expression 33. Price dynamics under
normal economic conditions
are probably intermediate between the models of section 2 and 4.
 
 
    
   