 
    
    
         
 The existence of a carrying capacity reduces the 
equilibrium value for the resource  by a factor of  relative to the harvesting equilibrium,
relative to the harvesting equilibrium,  , of section 2.
Alternatively, harvesting reduces the level of the natural resource 
by a factor of
, of section 2.
Alternatively, harvesting reduces the level of the natural resource 
by a factor of  relative to the carrying capacity.
 relative to the carrying capacity.
The absolute value of the real part of  , which determines
the strength of the attraction towards the equilibrium, is strongly increased
when the carrying capacity is of the same order as 
the harvesting equilibrium
, which determines
the strength of the attraction towards the equilibrium, is strongly increased
when the carrying capacity is of the same order as 
the harvesting equilibrium  . It can be observed on the time
plot of figure 5 that the carrying capacity limits
the upward oscillation of the resource, thus limiting the overshoot
and the subsequent backlash. This corresponds to the 
results shown in figure 14: the resource 
depletion curve for a carrying capacity
of five times the harvesting equilibrium is well above 
the same curve in the absence of a carrying capacity.
In other words, if resources were harvested at a rate 
such that the harvesting equilibrium were of the same order 
of magnitude as the 
carrying capacity then resource depletion would not be a 
big issue, even for small values of
. It can be observed on the time
plot of figure 5 that the carrying capacity limits
the upward oscillation of the resource, thus limiting the overshoot
and the subsequent backlash. This corresponds to the 
results shown in figure 14: the resource 
depletion curve for a carrying capacity
of five times the harvesting equilibrium is well above 
the same curve in the absence of a carrying capacity.
In other words, if resources were harvested at a rate 
such that the harvesting equilibrium were of the same order 
of magnitude as the 
carrying capacity then resource depletion would not be a 
big issue, even for small values of  .
.
Using equation 26, the linear fragility of the system is now given by
     
 The variations
of f with  are represented on figure 7.
 are represented on figure 7.
   
Figure 7:  Linear fragility, defined in the text as the ratio
between relative resource depletion to initial relative capital 
distance to equilibrium (see figure  3)
is represented as a function of  , the ratio of
the carrying capacity to the harvesting equilibrium
for a
, the ratio of
the carrying capacity to the harvesting equilibrium
for a  coefficient of 0.1. Computation is done 
according to equation  28. Resource depletion is strongly
attenuated by the existence of a carrying capacity
of the same order as the harvesting equilibrium.
 coefficient of 0.1. Computation is done 
according to equation  28. Resource depletion is strongly
attenuated by the existence of a carrying capacity
of the same order as the harvesting equilibrium.
 The stronger attenuation of the oscillations
by the carrying capacity
is accompanied by a decrease in the size of the  region
in which oscillations occur. The following values of
 region
in which oscillations occur. The following values of 
 limit the oscillation region:
 limit the oscillation region: 
 
For instance, when the carrying capacity m is large compared to 
the harvesting equilibrium  , the upper range in
, the upper range in  of the oscillatory 
region is decreased to
of the oscillatory 
region is decreased to  instead
of the limit of  8 which was found for the system without carrying capacity.
 instead
of the limit of  8 which was found for the system without carrying capacity.
 
 
    
   